![]() She lambasted the company for effectively leaving the window open to data being stolen and when asked in a TV interview whether she believed Optus’ claim that it was the subject of a sophisticated attack, O’Neil said: “Well, it wasn’t. When O’Neil did become publicly involved on Monday, she made up for her absence immediately. They posted a sample of 200 customer records to substantiate their claims.Ĭybersecurity Minister Clare O’Neil was initially quiet on the Optus hack, but then spoke with a steely directness that undercut the company’s official line. ![]() They wanted a $US1 million ($1.54 million) ransom in a cryptocurrency called Monero in seven days, or else the cache would be sold to cyber criminals for $US300,000. Researchers who monitor the shadier parts of the internet found a forum user called “Optusdata”, with a default profile picture of an anime woman, claiming to have data from Optus on more than 10 million Australians and personal identity document numbers from about 4 million. It irked her opposite number, Liberal cybersecurity spokesman James Paterson, who shot back that she should be telling Australians what the government was doing about the breach. Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil, who is also cybersecurity minister, was tweeting about the AFL and NRL finals. Meanwhile, the federal government was quiet. And we will not be releasing further details at this stage.” The company’s justification was that the Australian Federal Police were investigating. “It should not have happened.”īut it did happen, Bayer Rosmarin said, because it was a “a sophisticated attack. “I’m very sorry, and apologetic,” she said. Bayer Rosmarin fronted the press the next day, earning plaudits for showing she understood the emotional gravity of the breach. A perfect toolkit for cybercriminals to impersonate Australians and lift bank balances. Almost 3 million customers’ passport and licence numbers too. The names, addresses and contact details of about 9.8 million people had all been exposed. I think that was sort of a late-night call.”īy Thursday the company had alerted the press, albeit after The Australian newspaper had published a story, disclosing a breach. “It was only late that night that we were able to determine that it was of a significant scope. “At that stage did not understand the extent of it, just that we were sure something had occurred,” Bayer Rosmarin later told a press conference. ![]() The concern travelled up to the chief information officer, Mark Potter, who called Bayer Rosmarin. On Wednesday last week, someone at Optus noticed something was not right. Optus chief Kelly Bayer Rosmarin has endured a horror week that cyber experts and the government have argued her company should never have let happen. Now, all eyes are on Optus chief executive Kelly Bayer Rosmarin, who has vowed to stay on and lead the company’s response, to see if she will do the same. But five months later, after congressional hearings and revelations of disastrous cybersecurity at Target, Steinhafel resigned. He authorised a 10 per cent store-wide discount to try to regain goodwill. He said he would “get to the bottom” of the hack. ![]() Target’s chief executive, Gregg Steinhafel, whose business has no connection to the Australian retailer of the same name, clung on for months. Relative to the national population, the Target breach was about the same size as the Optus hack that has gripped Australia’s attention since it was revealed at 2pm on the public holiday called to mourn the Queen last Thursday. Then it clarified the two were separate but overlapping, taking the likely total towards 100 million. Then it said 70 million had personal information stolen. First the company announced credit card information had been taken from 40 million people. Nine years ago, the US retailer Target suffered a data breach. Normal text size Larger text size Very large text size
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |